HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 2025 CSZD packetCONSERVATION SANITATION AND ZONING DEPT
150 West Alona Lane, Suite #1, Lancaster, WI 53813 608/723-6080
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Committee
THE GRANT COUNTY CONSERVATION, SANITATION AND ZONING COMMITTEE will call the
meeting to order on Thursday, October 2, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in Grant County Board Room #264 in the
Administration Building. Please use the following procedures to access the meeting remotely. Log into this site:
https:flLlsO2web.zoom.us/i/84676276850?pwd=FMt.TWHtJXkWMbwgV I k01 DFl JZ2 ' Pap I
Call in number will be 1-312-626-6799, Meeting ID: 846 7627 6850, Passcode 610719. Please use the following
procedures to access the meeting remotely. Please contact our office at 608-723-6080 with any questions.
Consideration will be given and/or action taken on any or all of the following agenda items:
Call to Order
Open Meeting Law
Roll Call
Approval of Agenda
Approval of September 4, 2025, Minutes
Review and Accept Bills
NRCS Report - Mike Adams
FSA Report -Emily Schildgen
Zoning/Sanitation Report
#CUP25-010 David Roh & Dale & Stacy Hagenston, Muscoda Twp., +/- 62.89 ac. PIN: 042-00460-0000,
042-00480-0000, 042-00478-0000, 042-00474-0000 & 042-00643-0000 to allow for the continued use of
Nonmetallic Mining under section 3.14(2)(a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
#CUP25-01.1 Mathews Island LLC, Watterstown Twp., +/- 229.63 ac. PIN: 060-00034-0000, 060-00036-0000 &
060-00041-0000 to allow for an accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal structure under
Section 3.06 (2) (i) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
#CUP25-012 Michaela L. Beyer, Ellenboro Twp., +/- 6.59 ac. PIN: 014-00378-0010 to allow for an accessory
structure prior to the establishment of a principal structure under section 3.07 (2) (a) of the Grant County
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
County Cost Sharing - Brady Bartels
SWRM Cost Sharing -Brady Bartels
FPP Report - Brady Bartels
Storage Permit Approval
CSZD Report
Set Date for Next Meeting
Closed Session per State Statute 19.85(1)(c) Considering employment, promotion, compensation or
performance evaluation data of any public employee over which the governmental body has
jurisdiction or exercises responsibility as it relates to the Position of the CSZD Administrator
Return to Open Session
Adjourn
........................................................................................
PUBLIC HEARING ORDER 3. Public 4. Applicant's Rebuttal
Statement 5. Committee Discussion
1. Zoning Office Statement -In Favor 6. Close Hearing
2. Applicant's Statement -In Opposition 7. Recommendation to County Board
-In Interest
September 4, 2025
9:00 a.m.
Room #264, Grant County Board Room, Administration Building
Lancaster, Wisconsin
The Grant County Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Committee meeting was called to order on September 4,
2025, at 9:02 a.m. by Joe Mumm, the Conservation, Sanitation, Zoning Committee Chairman in Room #264,
County Board Room of the Administration Building.
Board members present in the County Board room #264: Joseph Mumm, Brian Lucey, Larry Jerrett, Pat
Schroeder, Gary Northouse, and Roger Lange. Adam Day, Excused. Others present in the County Board room;
Annette Lolwing, Robert Keeney, Adam Reed, Keith Lane, Brady Bartels, Steve Smith, Nate Dreckman, Shane
Drinkwater, Lucas Finley, Drew Frey, Lester Jantzen, Chris Olson, and Rhonda Gildersleeve.
Zoom: Robert Keeney, Tonya White, Emily Schildgen, Mike Adams, Shane Drinkwater, and Keith Lane.
Certification of Open Meeting Law
Annette Lolwing sent the agenda to the County Clerk's office to post in the Administration Building,
Courthouse, and on the County website. An agenda was also posted in front of the Ag Service Center Building.
An agenda was also sent to Bob Middendorf, WGLR. Media notices were sent to the County Clerk's office,
Herald Independent, Muscoda Progressive, Boscobel Dial, Fennimore Times, and Bob Middendorf.
Approval of September 4, 2025, Agenda
Motion by Pat Schroeder, seconded by Gary Northouse to approve the agenda. Motion carried.
Approval of August 7, 2025, Minutes
Motion by Pat Schroeder, seconded by Roger Lange to approve the August 7, 2025, minutes. Motion carried.
Review & Accept the July Bills
Motion by Gary Northouse, seconded by Brian Lucey, to accept the August bills. Motion carried.
NRCS Report — Mike Adams
Mike reported on a few items that NRCS is working on:
• CRP —trying to get conservation plans and 1155's to FSA so they have time to approve them by the end
of the fiscal year, which is September 30, 2025. NRCS has 16 out of 47 left to do. Mike only has 2 CRP
participants that need their conservation plans completed, otherwise just waiting for people to call and
make an appointment to stop in. NRCS has been working with Annette on the CREP sign-ups.
• CSP & EQIP — contract reviews are also due by the end of the fiscal year. This is to make sure that all
the producers that have EQIP contracts are still associated with that farm.
• Starting October 1, 2025, NRCS will be transitioning to a complete electronic filing system.
FSA Report — Emily Schildgen
Emily Schildgen reported that the fiscal year ends on September 30th. It is clean up time in the office to make
sure they have everything.
FSA did have the dairy margin coverage program. The premiums for 2025 were due September 1 St.
Supplemental Disaster Relief Program (SDRP) — Stage #1 is going on right now. It is for people who had a crop
loss in full or in part for 2023 and 2024 calendar year due to a qualifying disaster event. A list of qualifying
disaster events was provided at the August 7, 2025, CSZD committee meeting. Anyone who got an indemnity
on their crop insurance would have received one of those stage #1 applications in the mail. There is supposed to
be a stage #2 coming for those who did not have crop insurance, or an indemnity triggered. It was initially
slotted for mid -September that has now been pushed back to mid -October. For stage #1 there is no deadline.
The deadline will be announced once stage #2 comes out.
CRP — FSA had just shy of 50 offers that were accepted through the sign up this year. This all includes new
offers, renewals, & CREP. NRCS is working on the conservation plans for those. Once it comes back to FSA
there is a variety of things that need to be done. Map work, making sure that the existing covers are still
compliant through site visits and status reviews. Emily must have everything approved by September 30th. Once
p g
October 1st starts, the CRP payments will start. FSA is making sure that all eligibility paperwork is completed
right now.
Zoning/Sanitation report
Keith presented the Zoning/Sanitation report.
Sanitation permits: For the month of August 2024, there were 13 sanitary permits issued. There were 88
sanitary permits issued year to date. For the month of August 2025, there were 10 sanitary permits issued. For
year-to-date there were 83 sanitary permits issued.
Zoning permits: For the month of August 2024, there were 27 zoning permits issued. There were 178 zoning
permits issued year-to-date. For the month of August 2025, there were 28 zoning permits issued. For year-to-
date there were 209 zoning permits issued.
Public Hearing for rezones
Chairman Mumm opened the Public Hearing
RZ25-16 Thomas & Sarah Knockel, Paris Twp. are requesting to change the zoning classification on
PIN: 046-00255-0010 of +/- 1.66 ac. from FP to A2 for a non -farm residence.
In Favor: Paris Twp. approved on August 12, 2025.
In Opposition: None
In Interest: None
Committee Discussion: None
Chairman Mumm closed the Public Hearing.
Motion by Gary Northouse, that the items are concurrent with all the conditions on the Farmland Preservation
Worksheet and to recommend approval of the rezone to the full County Board, seconded by Pat Schroeder.
Motion carried. See Attachment A Worksheet
Chairman Mumm opened the Public Hearing
RZ25-17 Alan & Debra Bendorf, Liberty Twp. are requesting to change the zoning classification on PIN:028-
00445-0000 of +/- 22.6 ac. from FP to A2 for a non -farm residence.
In Favor: Liberty Twp. approved on August 12, 2025.
In Opposition: None
In Interest: None
Committee Discussion: None
Chairman Mumm closed the Public Hearing.
Motion by Pat Schroeder, that the items are concurrent with all the conditions on the Farmland Preservation
Worksheet and to recommend approval of the rezone to the full County Board, seconded by Roger Lange.
Motion carried. See Attachment B Worksheet
Public Hearing for Conditional Use Permits
#CUP25-010 David Roh & Dale and Stacy Hagenston, Muscoda Twp. are requesting a Conditional Use Permit
on PIN:042-00460-00009 042-00480-00009 042-00478-00009 042-00474-0000, and 042-00643-0000 +/- 62.89
ac. to allow for the continued use of Nonmetallic Mining under Section 3.14(2)(a) of the Grant County
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
In Favor: Muscoda Twp. approved on July 9, 2025.
In Opposition: Chris Olson, Muscoda, asked the committee to not allow this mine to operate. This mine is
behind a platted subdivision and is in the county. Chris mentioned that the mine is a public nuisance. The dust,
the noise and the large equipment exhaust. Scares away wildlife. Mine operates, sometimes 7 days a week
working 10-hour days.
In Interest: Lucas stated that the mine is not going to be expanding outside of its existing mining boundaries. No
additional acreage has been added to their reclamation plan. This conditional use permit is an extension of the
permit that expired in 2024. Lucas stated that there was a miscommunication where Dave Roh didn't receive the
letter for renewal. This conditional use permit will continue from the 2024 expiration date.
Committee Discussion: Gary Northouse asked Chris Olson if he attended his town board meeting when they
approved this? Chris stated that Muscoda doesn't make regular announcements of when their town board
meetings are held. That is where Chris should have taken his concerns first, was to the town board. Roger Lange
asked how long has the mine been at this location? Chris thought that the mine was there for 3 years, but the
permit was issued a long time ago. Pat Schroeder asked if the mine was there before or after the subdivision was
established. Chris stated the subdivision is approximately 30-35 years old. Chris stated that they hadn't broken
ground to the mine until after he had moved in. Gary Northouse mentioned that the township board approved
that mine to begin with. Robert Keeney asked about access to the mine. Lucas stated that the access is at the
north end. It appears to be public access because Roh's house site is between the 2 small lines on the map. Gary.
Northouse asked if this was a heavily mined facility? Chris Olson stated "Yes" it is heavily mined. Keith Lane
mentioned that the CSZD had received numerous complaints about the pond area being a nuisance as well. That
is one reason that Southwest WI Regional Planning Commission, Lucas, and himself met on site. The water that
is in the pond was clear at the time. At that point in time SWWRPC and Keith Lane did not find any issues with
meeting their requirements with their state permit. They do sand/gravel separation mainly for packing sand.
There was no gravel stockpiled on site. Pat Schroeder mentioned that he has a hard time going against the
township's approval. Pat and Gary stated the Chris Olson needs to address his concerns with the township
before it gets to them public hearing at the CSZD meeting. Joe Mumm mentioned that it is a mine and there will
be noise. Rhonda Gildersleeve is also a landowner. Her land is not adjacent to the mine. She hasn't had any
issues what Chris is talking about, but her concern is that the wells are quite shallow, and she is wondering if
there is any impact on the existing wells. Rhonda received the public notice on the weekend before Labor Day,
which she was unable to talk to anyone about it to call any comments in. Rhonda's house was built in 1995 and
would precede the mine. Keith stated that the well issue is part of the mine's use plan with the state and would
need to be registered and addressed in that agreement with DNR. Brian Lucey asked how long the permit is
good for. It expires in 5 years.
Chairman Mumm closed the Public Hearing.
Motion by Pat Schroeder to postpone this Conditional Use Permit until next month, October 2nd, seconded by
Gary Northouse. Motion carried.
Approval of Small & Large Solar Energy Ordinance
Keith mentioned that he has received the small and large ordinance back from legal. Keith needs approval from
the committee to post for the 30-day public review period before it is taken for approval at the County Board.
Motion by Pat Schroeder, seconded by Gary Northouse to approve the small and large solar energy ordinance to
move forward and to put it out for the 30-day public review. Motion carried.
Drew Frey —1,000' Cul de Sac Subdivision Development
Keith stated that in our ordinance with a limitation of Cut de Sac access road is written to be 1,000' in length. In
Drew Frey' s current map his current length of the access road is 1,190' . In our subdivision plan review, it is the
committee that needs to approve the actual plan. Drew worked with DOT to work out acceptable access to the
subdivision. The access road going to the south was 1,003' long. This one was shortened to less than 1,000'.
They tried to shorten the access road going to the east, but the lots got very triangular and odd shaped, difficult
to build on. The access road is roughly 200' longer than what the ordinance allows. Drew really doesn't want to
reduce the number of lots. He would then need to charge more per lot to recoup the cost of the project. Drew
mentioned that each lot is required to have at least 40' of frontage. Motion by Gary Northouse to approve the
1,190' access road to the east, without sending this on to the Board of Adjustments, seconded by Roger Lange.
Motion carried.
Faye Pensel — Rip Rap Discussion — Faye was not in attendance, because of health complications. Faye still
has some issues with the July meeting minutes. She still feels that the pond is not a privately owned resource
which has public entry to it. Faye replied that if someone would come and ask to fish, she considers that as
public access. Keith also went over the July minutes stating that Faye felt that she was quoted as saying that she
was not working with the agencies. When Keith read it, it is not her that is not working with the agencies it is
our DATCP engineer that is not interested in working on that project. She still feels that she is allowing public
access to the pond with the way she has set it up. Keith explained that without public parking or easement to the
property that no one could walk on the property without asking for permission is still considered as private. Due
to the rain events that happened in August we have enough projects and then some that we are exhausting all of
our current funding and into next year's funding to get projects addressed from the erosion issues. There will be
no available funds this year and it will be very questionable for funding in 2026. According to a photo that was
handed out, there are 2 no trespassing signs at the entrance of Faye Pensel's driveway.
Grant County Farm
Keith and Brady have been out to the site with the .DATCP engineer to look at the Grant County farm. They will
look at regrading and some additional burming to control the storm water runoff from the hard surface from
Orchard Manor and Sheriff's Department. Keith mentioned that during the budgeting process there was
approximately $9,700 sitting in an account. This money came out of the MDV funding; the county project
would be a good way to spend that money for the conservation practice of regrading and redeveloping the site.
Kieler Ball Field
Keith and Brady mentioned that Taylor, DATCP Engineer, hasn't gotten any recommendations back to the
office yet. There is a significant amount of work that needs to be addressed. Water is coming down through the
ball field and through the batting cage and is gouging out part of the hill on the back side of the church. Our
office is working with Brian Lucey and the athletic group to see what can be done. Monies can be spent north
on the ag areas. We may be able to do some work on the ball field. It is privately owned not ag. As of now they
are looking at putting in a retention pond type development with an inlet to pipe that water underneath the ball
field and out letting it into a stable environment due east down by the creek. Water is coming across the ag
property from the 151-highway interchange.
County Cost Sharing: Beginning Balance $23,756. 10 / Ending Balance $22,264. 10
Brady p pp resented tentative approval request for county cost sharing for a well decommissioning project for Julie
Klinger, Platteville Twp., $492.00. Motion by Pat Schroeder, seconded by Gary Northouse to approve Julie's
request. Motion carried.
Brady presented tentative approval request for county cost sharing for rye cover crop for Scott & Carolyn
Runde, Hazel Green Twp., $1,000.00. Motion by Gary Northouse, seconded by Larry Jerrett to approve the
Runde's request. Motion carried.
2024 DATCP Cost -Sharing Requests: Beginning Balance $52,968.12 / Ending Balance $39,893.52
Brady presented a final approval request for county cost sharing for a streambank protection project for Steve &
Karen Wiencek, Millville Twp., $13,074.60. Motion by Roger Lange, seconded by Brian Lucey to approve
payment. Roll Call: 6 Yes, 0 No, 1 Excused. Motion carried.
2025 DATCP Cost Sharing Requests: Beginning Balance $38,281.56 / Ending Balance before projects were
completed 69,763.74.
FPP Report — Brady Bartels
Brady reported that Little Willow Branch LLC, Liberty Twp. voluntarily signed the opt out of Farmland
Preservation form. Motion by Pat Schroeder, seconded by Brian Lucey to approve Little Willow Branch LLC
opting out of FPP. Motion carried.
Storage Permit Approval — Brady Bartels
Brady reported that he has 2 waste storage permits that he had issued. Marlin Shirk, approximately 80 dairy
cows and heifers. Larry Tranel, Tranel Family Farms, this storage permit is for their heifer barn. Both plans
meet our required standards. Motion by Gary Northouse, seconded by Brian Lucey for concurrence of Brady's
permit approval. Motion carried.
NMP Expectation Letter
Keith reported that this is the final product that will be sent out to the producers and to the plan writers. This is
the timeline that was discussed to make sure that we are going to be meeting the new developments with the
Nutrient Management Plans timeline with the state. We are going to be monitoring the NMP's for complete and
accurate information. Steve Smith stated that April 15 th will be the new date for NMP's to be completed for that
year's cropping season. This year the NMP's are required to be submitted by November 241h . We would like to
have these turned into the office prior to the CSZD committee meeting in December. If they are enrolled in the
Southwest Tech NMP class, they may turn their NMP's in when their class is completed.
CSZD Report
Conservation: September overview..
Keith went through a few of the highlights from the September overview notes that were handed out.
1. Keith reported that Steve Smith is over 50% done on his FPP spot checks.
2. Met with DATCP to do CREP re-monumentation on two properties.
3. Discussed the NMP letter that will be sent out.
4. Investigated 2 manure discharge to a waterbody complaints. Manure was piled inside of floodplain setbacks.
5. The 2025 fair was a good fair. Keith thanked the fair board for allowing us to move out of the corner. NRCS
supplied us with some good stuff to hand out to the kids. CSZD handed out orange carpenter pencils, and
black & white cow pencils along with cow erasers.
6. The committee agreed to participate in the Deer Donation Program again in 2025/2026.
Zoning:
1. Keith mentioned that Whitetail Winds zoning permit has expired. They have sent in a written request for an
extension. They were asked to re -apply for their 21 sites underneath a regular zoning permit and pay -their
$4,200. The CUP is still active.
2. Paris Twp. Kennel Order for Correction for his signs will expire. We are looking at the Grant County
Highway Department to remove them so they can issue the Kennel a bill for sign removal. Keith met with the
assessor for that property and gave us his assessed values for the buildings; 2 block structures. Then they used
the small building guy on Hwy 81 on the way to Platteville for cost estimates on the 17/18 smaller temporary
structures. The Kennel will also need to rezone 4 acres to cover the kennel. There has been no contact with
our office, the kennel owner will not respond. If he doesn't come in for his post zoning, he will go directly to
citation.
3. Keith was out to the Ellenboro/Henry gravel pit with Southwest WI Regional Planning Commission. The
Rutkowski's have done some seeding. There was also some gully erosion. Rutkowskis will then reseed. They
have expanded and are working outside of the workspace at the Baker gravel pit. It will require an updated
site development plan and restoration plan to bring it back into compliance. A new CUP will need to be issued
as well.
4. Keith reported on the Paige LeConte sign on Hwy 151. Advertising her real estate business. They did not
receive DOT permits to install the sign. DOT is denying their permit as it does not meet DOT standards.
5. The Board of Adjustments was postponed on August 28 1h and rescheduled for September 25th @ 1:00 p.m.
Sanitation:
1. No public complaints came in.
2. There will be 2 landowners that will be coming off on our long-term citations list. The next court date for
those habitual offenders will be on October 1st.
3. There is an insert which is an ongoing situation with a plumber.
The next meeting is scheduled for October 2, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in the County Board room.
Motion by Gary Northouse, seconded by Fat Schroeder to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted by Annette Lolwing
Attachment A Worksheet
Review of Standards for Rezoni ng Land out of Farmland Preservation
INC'%
Date: Landowner-..
. ..........
The Grant County Roard may, not rezone land out of a, farmland preservation zoning district unless the Grant County
Zoning and Sanitation Comm ittee,finds all the folloviing In writ"Ing, after public hearing, as part, of the official record of
the rezonling.,
1. The rezoned land is better suited for a use, not allowed In the farmland preservatiort zonfigg, district,
or N'o- Explal"'n-,
I The ring pis consistent with any com.preherisive, plan., adopted by the Grant Coun. ty Board which t'slin
effectat the t Me of the rezoning.
or No o, r N/A
Expla[n: A'�io a )wo r (I , PVAPV�A
3 -, ningAs0 1 bil y' consistent witfi. the Grant County.- farmland preservation plan policy. The rezos: bs!-. nt"'
W 3- farm develop.ment will be directeed to non-agricultural soils or Jess productive agricultural1 F. Non
solls, consistent with the needs. of the development,, IN`o
3 Non -farm developmerit will be, directed, to areas where it, will cause MIMmy, of
No
established farm operatlilons or damageto environmentaltv sen-sitive area$., e:e s
83 Non -farm, development will be encouraged to locate; so as to leave a maxlmu,m amount of,
fa mil e p
a nd In fa rm.a ble M
za:.rcels. "Y'S
b
-a -11 be directed to existing platted su''. d" sionsand sarliftary
3-4 Nonfbrm:reS;I"' evelopment wi IVI
d [st-r-1,1-c- ts.
N,
-o
Agdcultorafly rela ri ted development, while not discaurageed In rvral areas will still complyw th
d whe re 't wil I be a m axim UM
other pollcles set -forth in, .section, consistent With beingiocate.
'I Ure.
beinefift -to agrIcult- No
.4 The rezoning will not substantially'Impair or lirnit curren 'rfuttureagricultu',al use of other Protected farmland.
4.1 Located, in a Farmland preservation zon'lling district
4.2 Covered by a Fa.,.rm land Preservation Agreement
4.3 Covered by. an agIrlicultural conservation ease, ment
4.4 Otherw" se le I rom nona
I gall y protected f cultura.1 deve I opment girl
t u
Explain: dt'p; 5 'n
5 The CS recommendsVoes not recommend approval to the Grant Count , Board of Supervisors
(Ortfle one)
Mcichment B Worksbeet
Review of Standards for Rezoning Land out of Farmland Preservation
V
ate
adownr: A!i 101D-. 3 Lne1
The Great County Board may riot rezone land out of a farmland preservation zoning district unless the Grant County
Zoning and Sanitation Committee finds all of the following in, writing,, after public hearing, as part of the official, record of
the rezo. W rig
1., 'T-"..he rezoned kand is be.'..tter sufted, for a use not allowed "in tie farmland' preservation zoning d1strict.
or Na Exp
in., VOL
la
1 The rezon Ing 'I's cows,[�.Sterft with any cornprehe nafve plan, a alopted: by the Grant County Board which is In
effect at- the. time of the reion[ng.
or No or NIA
3, Tlierezoni.g'lssu-.bstatit'lailyconsis�te:nitwi-tll,,th.eGi,,a'n"tCounty farmland preservation plan policy.
31; Non-farnn develapmeat will be directed to noti-a. � � ,cul soils or tess p-roductive agrill"cultural
consisteat w4th—the needs of tlhe. des eir-rpmeq'It, N o
irft ill cause minimum dis,rupflon of
3,2 Nion-farm developmen-twill be. dected are
as e-as wfitre P w
ry sensitve. a,r) No
established farm op.erationma s or age to: envflronmeat aflireas,Yef
33, Non,"farm develop rye will bel, encoura,ged to -Jocate so as to Jeave a maximijmarn, o.. un t off
farmland in farmable s" No
tze parc.
3�.A N:on4a,,.rm.,re.5JdZ,- development Will be 4-irected to existing platted subdivisions and sanitaro
distrqcrts3 No
35 Agr"cuttvrally-related development, while not d.1scouraged. in rural areas,,, Will still comply with
•? -ier -1t wi1 I be a maximum0 etion,,onsinwith being lca edwh e
,4 The rezoning will. not substantfal[y impair or Oftit currentor future agriculltu."ral use of other protected farmland.,
4A Lot atedin a f4lrmla nd: reservat'lon zonifngg distr ct
P
4
e -a .2 Covered 'blvt a Farmland Pre!,�7. rv. ifilon Agreement
4.3 Covered by an aig-.r"I'c-ultura.l:con serv.citl"o,n easement
4.4 Otherw,]N8 leggyy protected from nonagntultural development
Yes or No
19 apt. as VeA
Expl,,.rain, in 1%rxk
m d. does, not recommend app ro -t County.,Board of Su.pervlsors,
eco, m. -end. .va I to th e G ra n
5 The;CSZ.
jOrc �'One)
fOOV-411"Or4 v
■j r .i
X h:
.w
r-
fit.-S. ": -.> .. l
na - e or__ f_ Acco n.
v
fi
escr-�..Credi CC�- e �s
Fees - N M M
10062001
443014
. $0.00
Fees - Maintenance
10062002
443020
$11,075.00
Fees - Sanitary Permits
10062002
443010
$3,600.00
Fees - Sanitation/State &, DNR
80100000
242940
$1,200.00
Fees - Misc
10062002
468200
$2,250.00
Fees - Zoning
10062002
443012
$10,781.00
Access Systems Leasing
10062001
581001
Copier Lease -Sharp
$416.06
GFC Leasing
10062001
581001
Copier Lease -Canon
Greg Cerven
10062003
521000
Service/Salary
$1,000.00
Greg Cerven
10062003
531000
Office Supplies
$37.50
Greg Cerven
10062003
533000
Mileage
$192.27
Lancaster Ag Ofc Bldg LLC
10062001
553050
Building Lease
Morris Newspaper
10062002
532001
Public Notice
$455.60
US Cellular
10062001
522004
Brady, Steve
$68.48
US Cellular
10062002
522004
Jim, Lucas, Adam
$102.72
USPS Meter
10062001
531001
CSV Admin Postage
$70.66
USPS Meter
10062002
531001
S/Z Admin Postage
$41.57
Kwik Trip Rewards
10062001
535001
CSV Fleet Fuel
$265.92
Kwik Trip Rewards
10062002
535001
S/Z Fleet Fuel
$425.27
Amazon Capital
10062002
531000
AA Batts,Tape,Postits,Laminating Paper
$47.09
Amos Fisher
10062002
443012
ZP 2025-6031 Refund
$90.00
Alpha Nurseries
10062001
539000
Tree Sale Deposit
$1,879.68
Cardmember Svcs
10062001
531001
Encdicia Mo Fee
$9.99
Cardmember Svcs
10062002
524002
Oreillys--Rear View Mirror
$27.99
Engel's Nursery
10062001
53900
Tree Sale Deposit
$982.35
Wolf's Grantland Graphics
10062001
531000
#10 Envelope
$195.00
Wolf's Grantland Graphics
10062002
531000
Window Envelope
$295.99
Steve Wiencek
10062001
575002
SWRM C/S--Streambank Protection
$13,074.60
Tricor Ins
10062001
551001
CSV Vehcile Ins
$916.43
Tricor Ins
10062002
551001
S/Z Vehicle Ins
$276.26
Subtotal
-
$28,906.00
$20,871.43
Totals
$8,034.57
CSZC Initials:
Approved by CSZC on:
Lc)
N
0
N
O
Lc)
N
0
N
M
0 m
0
w
U.
z
0
ICL
w
a
F-
0
ul
0
prill
4
w
z
w
0
0
z
uj
CL
LLJ
in
3:
LU
r
ce)
LO r 0
0 00
CO � (N - Q0 o10 Ce) C.0 q 0-) 0)
fi
i C)
C C) C) Lf)
I - C ,,I- Ni cy) CD LO CD Ii CY) a) C) m
C.� .0
CY) (C) 06
CO0) r, LO
06 i, C) 0. tl-- 1 4 LO Lr) U) k LO I C%4
Ce) a) Im r'. CY) (0 LO a r-� g
CO 0 1"
00
00 M
(N
A C\I OD
C�
R
3 g.
st
z
0
Ji
0
g
LL g
J, 41 1
CY) &
CD
CY) CD § LO LO CY) Ce
a
Lf LO 0 04 04 CD )
C) 0 0 LO
CD
C c) 4m CN N
0 9 LO
CY-) CY)
0 C) LO
o) C) co C) C,
cy)
C)O R
0 Y F LO Itt LO gr CD
1 N (N f� g CD "t
04 N co C:) --' (=) �f
co "It m N 9 j N
I W g, I i- - -t I, -rt '5 N I -
C) I r-- 15� r-- A co R m w w c a) Z) w
D
LO
It I CIO I U) I U) Nt a
C:.) . . . . . . . . . . . .44. (D r LO
U) N LO L-0
< < co
Lc
6 mq�,m�
R w15
U) "rl
fr-,
R 35 1
r
sr 4-1 4-
UCU 0 1 cu P
z
iq C L F I
I LL 73 173 -Y! r
-5 L- A -? 73 1 51; 1 -- k. (1) 1 ��i
0 -C -C �Q' a -0
CI) I a) >
C) cu 0) a) IN a) I
ga c
a-"o co 0 0is > >
AI :c;�7 -'1e-1, R(f) U) I Ea
•aa)
:pu CI p g CCCaL cu
a) cu
CL
cu g; :_I:
cu :3 =I I 1 0
X R, x cu
U) I U) I N 3
cu cn Lij I ui w U) R I--
0) C;)
g CU CU
CCU CL a) ID _5 CU CuCuL L 6 C.)
co
4-f
#-, . �5 �j .4 cU
4- U)
U)
0
0 a) g q a) (D
C)
2 0 -4-3 :3 0
0 1 cu cr s- I CL (D 0 a) 1 0 A
c
11, Oa. CL I U
w I IL Ct) I > 1-1 0- 1 EL o go -51.0 110 1 U- I LE C L L
a
C) I 9 C) 04 N I r-- I r- 0 10 1 C) .0 0 1
1 C) go C:) C:) C:) g 0 g. C) C)
o go I C) C) 1 10 1 I'l C:) C)
'o j ji; (=)
0 C) C:) C:) a o
0 N 0 C) i C) C:) C) C)
C) 1 5 C:) C:) C) go I
R R C) 311 c) 10 IIR o io 1, C:)
C\1 CN Ce) CY) T- T- T.- 0") LO LO I cq I Lr) I
cy) CN IN CY) 00 CY) Ce) ct I
LO LO CO 1 04 1 CY) CY) a CY) CY) CY) cy) -1 cy) cy) cy) 5
LO LO LO LO LO LO 1-1 LO LO 't LO I Lr) LO LO LO LO LO U-) LO LO LO L6 LO
C� #
LO
-R 1 01 (Y) N CY)
-0 1- 0 1 CY) s C\I 5 C\I v N 115 N
o 1, c D o 5 C) g C) 10 go C:) g o o I C) 1 0 go 51-1 o go I o f
R
C) C) 0 1 a C) 10 1 C) C) K C) o ss C) J C) 10 0 1 (5 c) c c
C) go go
0 F., C) S
-0 c) 5
N I N (N 9 C\1 I
N CN CN I N & N IR N AR N Ali N C'
CD 11; (D a C.0 N CN N g CN -4 N N CN CN If CN CN
C.0 (d (C) (0 1 CD I, CD R (D I C.0 i to 5 CD (0 (0 CO N
'(0. I(D (0 1 C.0 1 (.0 1 C.0 ED
0, 51 c::) g C:) c) I C) i C) C) gN, C:) -01 C:) i", C:) C) C) C) C) C:)
c c) C) C) c 5 -11 C) o
I C) N!, c) 10 00 C) I C:) I C) g C) o. C:) 90 5 C:) g 0
c) C5 I C)
C:) C:) C:) C)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N Y!
d
U)
0
0
CL
R.,
o
P
N
CL
U)
W
:2
Z
n
z
a.
I U- w
C/)
cu Ng
5 W
<
0
A
w
cu
<
U) Y, 31 5 > CO Rell, U) ii I LLI
co C-0
w N 0 LLJ
Lu I ry 0
C\j f 0
I Q (0 m <
CO LU
U)
CN
F- _j
co 00 t n U) LL
< 1,00 <
W IR I o w N
> LLJ I
w ii w (3) LIJ w d
LL W o I w
CL 0 0 U) > F-
00 ob C) 'I W Z)
0 � > CL cu r-)
z
fZ 4 01- < J n I
w -0
1 1 Z 10 W 11 LL 1 0 1
21 W I W
co w LLJ -1-
:D I w I
5' 1 U) I U) C) C) 10 (J)
10 < ;i 3: o < W F- I I u
w g - I w Z
> W (D 0 < >
9
CL g 0 () C)
ry W
< I >-
n CL U) U)
ca w A, R, Z I -o e z >
<
C/) IF� U)
U) 10 1 w U
0 U) I w w W 0
1 <
go a EL -J
•0 ` 0 A w IL 1- a- w I w I z z I cn
U- z 0
U) 110 1 < 1,
E C)
U- 5 0 R z ;'J, U) '2 U) g ry i ry g� — 'I go I N
0 co
U) N < W NI 0 F F a.
I co D- I
F Ni I
5, �O .1 3 ji -a
I g
a G) (D (D Q) I Q)
R!" a) CD I a) I a)
C.) 0 U 4--1
C: C: I C: -15 +5
I C: t, (D F - C: C:
F
g U-
U- U-
U- U-
w w W n W N�' n 9 ui n a- 0-
W CL
1�3
N,
CD ci)
0 1
S R
U) C/) a
CL
cn U) U)
m cu g
0 z
CU 52 1 0 F.
U)
10 a) :5 If &ii
A W
U)
0 U)
U)
0 1 a) 1 ry
(D R, g,-" 0
R q cu J
HT - U)
c 1� C: I I ;
9 (D CD I (D F cu 5
9 co ri) g CL i CL s,
EL U) CD C: Cp U)
CU a) 3 (D 05 3
g I (D a) a) 0 1 a) U) i C.) 0
4-1 , < s- 31 06
c a o cu 0 q cu f >, la N
C U) (D a) (D
I .
g ( Ja m cu 5
c: U)
I r 0
CL C 1 Z V I
p 0 - i -
cu C: —C: CO I - 0. Irl w w B Cf) Z 5 ! �: 4 - r I -C: I Z
0 U)
3 0
N �5 ;i'
L- L cu
--a
0 N U) 0 1 CL Z
0 i E
0 �i 0 w 0
r L� 0 (1) r CL -L
ch
g C-) g 0 s- W Lij
c
0 1 C 0 •C 1 0
E c 8, c
L- L
:t:! CL
cu g cu E 14 Zt 0 — 1
(D <
j L) Z) CL W .D-
rgIr
R
g
2 J,
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0
0 11 "! 0 0 0 q! 0 0 0 14, 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
A 0
N N I N I N N N 4 N v N N I N N N g N N N N N I N 11 N N gI N N
c c: 11 c c a 1 C: a i c I C: I C: 5 c
C: a g
ca cu cu ca ca 10 ca 1 cu cu L. cu o- cu cu cu cu I CU CU ;--I cu cu ca K cu cu
cu cu
0- cu
U) U)
C/5
ch ch U) U) U) in to U) A U) ch to to ch in U) k V) U) C/) a cn (n
c C: c:
en w ch
0 0 i-T 0 0 0 i 0 1 0 1 0 Q 0 11 0 1 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 ig 0 0
0 c: I
0 0 1 0 1 0
C)
C)
C) C) C) 5 L) 1 5-1 L) C) R-S c)
LO L 0 LO i o go 50 cy) C.0 co C) c) I C M N 04 Ri L 0 1 LO 4-
Ln CY)
b Y) cy)
cp g r�, CY) -4 CF) 1 T- LO I Lr) ce) 4 ce) I C:) Nq 0
0)
CF) (3) CY) F C) 00 CO r, G)
C cr) c a ce)
4 N
(m C) o If C) I N C\I C) '0
C\I C\j cr) 'a) Y N I N 0 A R C) Y 0 a I C5
N N
N N I
C)
o 0 0
I - p '0 C) '1 0 C) g l,
10 C) 0 CD
(N N CN N ii", N N H N (N N .4 N N c R, N
L 0 W LO I U) U) LO LO 11 L 0 1 LO I. U-) U-) U-) LO Y11, LO 51, U-) tn
LO I U) LO
N § N I N
QN N N 1.. (N CN c N N
1.0
0 U-) I , `
LO
LO LO M
C) 0 1 C) C) 0
le C:)
0
C) c)
0
0) (M rn 0) a)
Cy) 0-) 0) 0)
a) m --0)
o
0 m 1 0) 4 0) 10) o
C)
C) C) o 0 C) CD C) I
0
C) C) o o C)
C) a CD
-41 i
L --A
,A
2
FSA Notes — October CSZD Meeting
Emergency Commodity Assistance Program (ECAP) — If you remember back in late
March 2025, this program rolled out and paid producers 85% of a set rate per acre for each
commodity based on 2024 reported acres. This signup closed on August 15, 2025. On
Friday, September26, the office was informed that there was money left that was allocated
for the program and the payment factor had been revised from 85% to 99%. The majority of
the additional 14% payments were processed by the office between September 26 and
September 30. It usually takes about a week for producers to see payments in their bank
account after the office signs them.
Fall Crop Reporting —As always, November 15 is the fall crop reporting deadline. So, any
fall -seeded small grains, Like wheat or rye, and fall -mint must be reported by November 15
to avoid late file penalties. If producers are- seeding down cover crops or have forage
policies with crop insurance, it is highly recommended that they get those reported as well
due to state programs and crop insurance needs. The office is in the process of mailing
crop reporting maps to anyone who told us in spring that they would be doing fall seeding.
Since not everyone does fall seeding, if producers don't get maps by October 15 and they
are needed, please reach out to the office and we can check into the status of them.
Flap Edits —This is typically the time of year when the office is trying to get maps edits and
farm reconstitutions done before we get too deep into programs for our fiscal year. FSA flew
new aerial imagery in fall 2024. Typically, the office receives this new imagery in our
mapping software about 6 months later. We have yet to receive the 2024 imagery in our
mapping software. The imagery is available and the picture of it can be seen on the fiscal
year 2026 (fall 2025) crop reporting maps, but the office does not have the imagery in our
software where we can update the field lines producers see on top of the imagery on the
maps. We are hoping the imagery becomes available in our mapping software soon, but we
want producers to be aware of why the imagery underneath may not match the field Lines
very well.
October is payment season at FSA. If there are payments triggered for the Agriculture Risk
Coverage/Price Loss Coverage (ARC/PLC) Programs, those would begin being processed
around October 8. Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) annual rental payments begin
getting processed on October 14. It takes time for the office to get through all of these
payments. Producers are reminded to make sure to update their direct deposit information
with the office if they have changed banks or if their bank's routing number has changed
(for example if the bank has been bought out by another bank, the routing number will
change).
Z . ONING/SANITATION REPOR'Im
January 1, 2024 — September 30, 2024
BOANARIANCE (100-62-461070)
7
5f600.00
7
......... . .
Class It -Collocation Mobile Tower Permit (100-62"-461070)
--------4
2f000.00
4
CONDITIONAL PERMIT (100-62-461070)
4
1,200.00
4
DNR (801-242940)
100
2f500.O0
100
........ ..... ..... .
Floodplain Zoning Permit (100-62-461070)
2
300.00
2
iml Use Agreement ,F
II-1-1-11111-11-1-1-
M R4 'KLATE '-FEE
37
MAINTENANCE FEE (100-62-443010)
2043
51, 125.00
2, 043
Modification (100-62-461071)
4
400.00
4
Navigability Determination (100-62-461070)
250.00
PERMIT EXTENSION (100-62-461070)
6
150.00
6..
PERMIT REVISION (100-62-461070)
25.00
PRIVY(100-62-46107�1)Y"..�.._,. .L.,�._,....__.n�„._.,.w...._.r_.:___..r_�....�:....,,:w.._.._,.:_....._..........._......L,�_...._w__rm,._._4.........._....�,v...l....,,..._,r..,._..__..._..._.._
....:........_._r._..__,,..rwv.�_.....4.0
o..s.0xo...._,.w_...._._..,�_.._.._.r�._..,_.�__,,...1.
.. ....... . .......
REC PLAN PUBLIC NOTICE (100-62-461070)
300.00
RECONNECTION _`'* 0 " E E -1 0-6-62-461071)
(100-62-461071)
8
500.00
8
4�tf(5NE (1-0'.-0-----6'.."2---..-4..61070)
19
71 600.00
19
SANITARY PERMIT (100-62-443000)
Shoreland Zoning Permit (100-62-461070)
23
2f500.00
23
Soil/Site Evaluation (100-62-461071)
95
9f500.00
95
STATE FEE (801-242940)
100
71500.00
100
........ZONING PERMIT (100-62-461070)
....... .... ...... . .......
FEE TOTALS
171f 888. 86
21733
January 1. 2025 — Septem-ber 30, 2025
ADM FEE-WF (100-62-461069)
1
if 100. 00
11
BOA/VARIANCE (100-62-461070)
800.00
............
�Iais-_-fil Collocation Mobile Tower Permit (100-62-461070)
_i�_
12
6f000.00
. ..........
12
6�dlf`_IO_NAL PERMIT (100-62-461070)
" - '
8
2f400.00
8
4_ 2--
DNR 9"" 4
. ... ....
2f325.00
93
F dp inZoning,--P-"e--,r","m"*"I'i"t", . . .....1.loo (100-62-461070)
...
150.00
w(,1--0--- 6--�62---4-
Gravity At -Grade Review
.... ... . ... -
11750.00
7
Limited Use Agreement Fee (100-62-461071) .......
......
1.0.0....=0 - 0
MAINT & LATE FEE (100-62-443010)
37
3r550.00
37
MAINTENANCE FEE (100-62-443010) . . . .......
1787
44f830.00
L..-1f 787
Modification (100-62-461071)... .........
......... . . ......
f 000 . 00
10
PERMITTENSION (100-62-461070)
_E'", - '' _-4-: , '6 - -0, , '7'* , '0"),
2
..... ......
50.00
2
PERMIT i4 V S 1' 6 N10", 0-6 1"
: 3"
, 7" , -5, 0- - 0
, , 3"
RECONNECTION FEE (100-62-461071)
12
2f200.00
12
-46 07 0, . ......
..... . ....... ... 15
6, 0 0 0 •
SANITARY PERMIT 0-6 43000)
9 3...... ....
. .........
Shoreland Zoning Permit (100-62-461070)
25
. . .....
2r�: 5OOOO.
25
of /Site Evaluation -1-11 - ...........
(100-62-461071)
... 96
9,,600.00
96
TxreEE�- ........
93
TRANSFER UNIT -RV (100-62-461071)
10
2f500.00
10
70NIN, - Ekml":T,-,(;l;,00-62-4'61.,0,7'',-O,)",�""*"",;"",''+''+'',-,:,*!,-*,,
1, 8 9
56f742.02-
189
FEE TOTALS
179,447.02
2f 519
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE GRANT COUNTY
CONSERVATION, SANITATION & ZONING COMMITTEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 2, 2025
at 9:00 a.m. in Grant County Board Room #264 in the Administration Building, 111 S Jefferson
St., Lancaster, WI 53813 to consider the following items. If you are interested in reviewing the
detailed land descriptions, please contact the Grant County Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning
Dept. (608) 723-6080. If you would like to provide written comment for the committee
members, it must be submitted to our department five business days prior to the public
hearing.
If you would like to participate in the meeting but can't attend in person, please utilize the
following Zoom link or dial -in info:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84676276850?pwd=FMU"tJXkWMbwgVlkOIDHJZ2ywSPgp 1
Dial In: 1 312 626 6799
Meeting ID: 846 7627 6850
Passcode: 610719
PETITION #CUP25-010: Conditional Use Permit Request for David Roh & Dale and Stacy
Hagenston, PIN:042-00460-0000, PIN:042-00480-0000, PIN:042-00478-0000, PIN:042-
00474-0000, & PIN:042-00643-0000, to allow for the continued use of Nonmetallic
Mining under Section 3.14(2)(a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
This is for ± 62.89 ac located in the NE % of the SE % and the SE % of the SE % of Section
11, and NE % of the NE % of Section 14, TBN, R1W, in Muscoda Township.
PETITION #CUP25-011: Conditional Use Permit Request for Mathews Island LLC,
PIN:060-00034-0000, PIN:060-00036-0000, PIN:060-00041-0000, to allow for an
accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal structure under Section
3.06 (2) (i) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. This is for ± 229.63 ac
located in the W % of the NE %, the NW % of the SE %, the SW %, the NW % of Section 2,
TBN, R2W, and the W % of the SE %, the NW % of the SE % of Section 3, TBN, R2W in
Watterstown Township.
PETITION #CUP25-012: Conditional Use Permit Request for Michaela L Beyer, PIN:014-
00378-0010, to allow for an accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal
structure under section 3.07 (2) (a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance. This is for ± 6.59 ac located in the NE % of the SW % and the SE % of the SW
of Section 17, T4N, R2W in Ellenboro Township.
Lucas Finley, Zoning & Sanitation Technician
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Dept.
Published: 9/18/25 and 9/25/25
Parcel Reference Map
I. z
8/18/2025, 7:35:45 AM
Tax Parcels
Grant County Roads
SECONDARY
LOCAL
r7r-!.44-I
WMI
F i, {� GjT as AA:t.r
3, y
/��� 1 N •tom _.
r
;_ Yr
1:7,090
0 325 650 1,300 ft
0 100 200 400 m
Grant County GIS
This map is for advisory purposes only. This document is not a legal survey nor is it intended to be used as such.
BEFORE GRANT COUNTY
CONSERVATION, SANITATION AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR OAV|DROHAND DALE & STACYHAGENSTON
FINDINGS OF FACT
The agency finds that:
1. David Rohand Dale & Stacy Hagensionown property located within the NEXandthe 3EXof
the SE X., of Section 11., and the NE Xof the NE Xof Section 14 Township 8 North.. Range 1 West.,
MuscodaTownship, Grant County, VV/. Such property consists oftax parcel numbers MN:O42-
OO4GO-OOOO,P|N:O42-OO4OO-OOOO,P|N:O42-OO478-OOOO,P|N:O42-OO474-OOOO,&P|N:O42-OOG43'
OOOO.
2.OnOctober 25 th,2023, the CSZD office sent aletter to David Roh and Dale & StacyHagerston
about the active CUP expiring on 7/2/24.
3. OnJune 3 m 12025, the C5ZOoffice made asbevisittothe RohSand Pit boaddress some
complaints from a neighbor and to deliver a CUP application for renewal since no
correspondence had been received from the initial letter.
4. On July 9th, 2025, the Muscoda Township Town Board approved the request for the conditional
use permit, 3 voting in -favor, 0 opposed. There were no conditions placed on the permit by the
Town Board.
5. OnJuly 28 m ,2O2S,the C3ZDoffice received the completed application.
G. On October 2 u " , 2025, the CSZC reviewed the CUP request through a public hearing and
determined the findings of fact to approve or deny the CUP application.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSSION
l. The CSZC (hereinafter referred to as the agency) has the authority pursuant to the Grant
County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Ch.S15 Subsection327 (5)to issue ordeny
make a findings of fact based on evidence presented, issue a determination whether the
standards of the ordinance are met, and require additional conditions, as needed. Based
upon the above findings and information provided at the public hearing, the CSZD finds that
the conditional use does or does not meet the following criteria:
2. The agency under Ch. 315 Subsection 3.27 (5) (c) shall consider the following criteria:
(1) That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to
or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare;
(2) That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property
values within the neighborhood;
(3) That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly_ development
and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;
(4) That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being
provided;
(5) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to
minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;
(6) That adequate prevention and control of water pollution including sedimentation are being
provided;
(7) That adequate measures will be taken to sustain existing topographic and drainage features and
vegetation cover on the site;
(8) That adequate location of the site with respect to flood plains and floodways of bodies of water;
(9) That adequate consideration of erosion potential of the site based upon degree and direction of
slope, soil type and vegetation cover;
(10) That location factors are considered which address:
(a) Domestic uses shall be generally preferred;
(b) Uses not inherently a source of pollution within an area shall be preferred over uses that are
or may be a pollution source; and
(c) Use locations within an area tending to minimize the possibility of pollution shall be
preferred over use locations tending to increase the possibility.
(11) That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the
district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified by the
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Committee; and
(12) In the case of nonmetallic mining, the Conservation, Sanitation, & Zoning Committee shall also
consider any reclamation plan submitted for the property and the reclamation plan's provisions for
maintaining lateral support and for depth of the quarry pursuant to the standards set forth in Wisconsin
Administration code Chapter NR 136.
3.3.2.8.2 Storm water discharges contaminated by sediment eroding from areas of bare soil that cannot
be stabilized by pavement, gravel, vegetation, or other permanent land cover shall be treated by best
management practices designed, installed and maintained to achieve compliance with the construction
site performance standards in s. NR 151.11(6m), Wis. Adm. Code, and in accordance with the
Department's Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Technical Standards.
Subpart D—Industrial Sand Subcategory
Source:42 FR 35851, July 12, 1977, unless otherwise noted.
§ 436.40 Applicability; description of the industrial sand
subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are applicable to the mining and the processing of sand and gravel
for uses other than construction and fill. These uses include, but are not limited to glassmaking,
molding, abrasives, filtration, refractories, and refractory bonding.
§ 436.41 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the general definitions, abbreviations, and methods of analysis
set forth in part 401 of this chapter shall apply to this subpart.
(b) The term "mine dewatering" shall mean any water that is impounded or that collects in the
mine and is pumped, drained, or otherwise removed from the mine through the efforts of the
mine operator. This term shall also include wet pit overflows caused solely by direct rainfall
and ground water seepage. However, if a mine is also used for the treatment of process
generated waste water, discharges of commingled water from the mine shall be deemed
discharges of process generated waste water.
(c) The term "I 0-year 24-hour precipitation event" shall mean the maximum 24 hour
precipitation event with a probable reoccurrence interval of once in 10 years. This information
is available in "Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40," May 1961 and "NOAA Atlas 2,"
1973 for the 11 Western States, and may be obtained from the National Climatic Center of the
Environmental Data Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
(d) The term "mine" shall mean an area of land actively mined for the production of sand and
gravel from natural deposits.
(e) The term "process generated waste water" shall mean any waste water used in the slurry
transport of mined material, air emissions control, or processing exclusive of mining. The term
shall also include any other water which becomes commingled with such waste water in a pit,
pond, lagoon, mine or other facility used for treatment of such waste water. The terms does not
include waste water used for the suction dredging of deposits in a body of water and returned
directly to the body of water without being used for other purposes or combined with other
waste water.
§ 436.42 Effluent limitations guidelines representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of
the best practicable control technology currently available.
(a) Except as provided in 1§ 25.30 through 125.32, and subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (b) and LcJ of this section, any existing point source subject to this subpart shall
achieve the following effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available
(BPT):
(1) With the exception of operation using HF flotation, discharges of process waste water
pollutants from facilities that recycle waste water, for use in the processing shall not exceed
the following limitations:
Effluent
characteristic
TSS
Maximum for any 1
145 mg/1
I Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
day
Effluent limitations
Average of daily values for 30 consecutive days
shall not exceed—
mg/l.
(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) (1) and (3) of this section, there shall be no
discharge of process generated waste water pollutants into navigable waters.
(3) Process generated waste water from facilities employing HF flotation shall not exceed the
following limitations:
[Metric units, kg/kkg of total product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of total product]
Effluent
characteristic
Maximum for any 1
TSS 10.046
Total fluoride 1.006
day
Effluent limitations
Average of daily values for 30 consecutive days
shall not exceed-
0.023
.003
[Metric units, kg/kkg of total product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of total product]
Effluent limitations
Effluent— -
characteristic Maximum for any 1; Average of daily values for 30 consecutive days
day E shall not exceed —
pH �(1)
'Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
(4) Mine dewatering discharges shall not exceed the following limitations:
Effluent limitations
Effluent
characteristic Maximum for any 1 FAverage of daily values for 30 consecutive days
day shall not exceed—
TSS 145 mg/1 125 mg/l.
IpH I(1) - I() - I
11 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. 1
(b) Any overflow from facilities governed by this subpart shall not be subject to the limitations
of paragraph (a) of this section if the facilities are designed, constructed and maintained to
contain or treat the volume of waste water which would result from a 10-year 24-hour
precipitation event.
(c) In the case of a discharge into receiving waters for which the pH, if unaltered by man's
activities, is or would be less than 6.0 and water quality criteria in water quality standards
approved under the Act authorize such lower pH, the pH limitation for such discharge may be
adjusted downward to the pH water quality criterion for the receiving waters. In no case shall a
pH limitation outside the range 5.0 to 9.0 be permitted.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE GRANT COUNTY
CONSERVATION, SANITATION & ZONING COMMITTEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 2, 2025
at 9:00 a.m. in Grant County Board Room #264 in the Administration Building, 111 S Jefferson
St., Lancaster, WI 53813 to consider the following items. If you are interested in reviewing the
detailed land descriptions, please contact the Grant County Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning
Dept. (608) 723-6080. If you would like to provide written comment for the committee
members, it must be submitted to our department five business days prior to the public
hearing.
If you would like to participate in the meeting but can't attend in person, please utilize the
following Zoom link or dial -in info:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84676276850?pwd=FMUWHtJXkWMbwgVlkOIDHJZ2 wSPa .l
Dial In: 1 312 626 6799
Meeting ID: 846 7627 6850
Passcode: 610719
PETITION #CUP25-010: Conditional Use Permit Request for David Roh & Dale and Stacy
Hagenston, PIN:042-00460-0000, PIN:042-00480-0000, PIN:042-00478-0000, PIN:042-
00474-0000, & PIN:042-00643-0000, to allow for the continued use of Nonmetallic
Mining under Section 3.14(2)(a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
This is for ± 62.89 ac located in the NE % of the SE % and the SE % of the SE % of Section
11, and NE % of the NE % of Section 14, TBN, R1W, in Muscoda Township.
PETITION #CUP25-011: Conditional Use Permit Request for Mathews Island LLC,
PIN:060-00034-0000, PIN:060-00036-0000, PIN:060-00041-0000, to allow for an
accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal structure under Section
3.06 (2) (i) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. This is for ± 229.63 ac
located in the W % of the NE %, the NW % of the SE %, the SW %, the NW % of Section 2,
TBN, R2W, and the W % of the SE %, the NW % of the SE % of Section 3, TBN, R2W in
Watterstown Township.
PETITION #CUP25-012: Conditional Use Permit Request for Michaela L Beyer, PIN:014-
00378-0010, to allow for an accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal
structure under section 3.07 (2) (a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance. This is for ± 6.59 ac located in the NE % of the SW % and the SE % of the SW
of Section 17, T4N, R2W in Ellenboro Township.
Lucas Finley, Zoning & Sanitation Technician
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Dept.
Published: 9/18/25 and 9/25/25
h N Wit` .
(� �Y
cti Why LW
% W
Z N H;cV aV
(13
w cc Cc
WN WN
H h 2 v) in v�
`0
to
N W yy W �+ W �y .
rYr/^lzt
ti
N
Q)cn 2co �
121 -
4-0
d 1¢
(7 N 3 3
Vj C4 N
y O ti O
LU yy
-_
rt oti o�
i
Z � y CO cQ
Z N
j . En U)
lo-
O�,� l �'
4
V �
BEFORE GRANT COUNTY
CONSERVATION, SANITATION AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR MATHEVVSISLAND LLC
P/N#OGO-OOOS4-OOOO,U6O-O003G-ODOO 060-00041-0000,
WATTERSTOWNTOWNSH|�GRANT COUNTY., W|
The agency finds that:
l. Mathews Island LLC owns property located within the W Y2of the NE Y4, the NW %of the SEY4,
the 3VVY4,the NVV}4ofSection Z,Township @ North, Range 2West, and the VVY2ofthe SEY4,the
NW %of the SE %of Section 3, Township 8 North, Range 2 West,. Watterstown Township, Grant
County, WI. Such property consists of tax parcel numbers PIN:060-00034-00001 060-00036-
00001 060-00041-0000.
2.OnJune 91h,2025, the Conservation, Sanitation and Zoning Department (CSZD) discussed the
permitting requ�ed for anaccessory structure built before aprincipal structure onPIN: 060-
0003-4-0000vvh~hindudedobtainingaRezone from CFRtoA1inorder toobtain aConditiona|
Use Permit since the Al zoning allows for accessory structures to be built before a principal
structure isestablished under conditional use.
3. OnAugust 8 th 1 2025, the Watterstown Township Town Board recommended approval for the
CUP. 3 were in favor, 0 opposed, and 0 abstained. No conditions were placed by the Town Board
onthe permit.
4. On July 141h 2025,. the Conservation,, Sanitation and Zoning Department (CSZD) received a
completed Conditional Use Permit application toallow for an accessory structure before a
principal structure under 3.06 (2) (i) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
5 On September 18 th and September 25 th,2024,apublic notice was published inthe County's
official newspaper for the CUP request.
G. (]nOctober 2"o,2O25,the [SZCreviewed the CUP request through apublic hearing and
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSSION
l. The CS ZC (hereinafter referred to as the agency) has the authority pursuant to the Grant
County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Ch. 315 Subsection 3.27 (5) to issue or deny
conditional use permits. Prior togranting ordenying acondhiona|use,1heagencyshaU
make afindings offact based onevidence presented, .issue adetermination whether the
standards of the ordinance are met, and require additional conditions, as needed. Based
upon the above findings and information provided at the public hearing, the CSZD finds that
the conditional use does or does not meet the following criteria:
2.The agency under Ch. 315 Subsection 3.27 (5) (c) shall consider the following criteria:
(I) That the establishment, maintenance., or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to
orendanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, orgeneral welfare;
(2) That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property
values within the neighborhood;
(3) That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;
(4) That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being
provided;
(5) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to
minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;
(6) That adequate prevention and control of water pollution including sedimentation are being
provided;
(7) That adequate measures will be taken to sustain existing topographic and drainage features and.
vegetation cover on the site;
(8) That adequate location of the site with respect to flood plains and floodways of bodies of water;
(9) That adequate consideration of erosion potential of the site based upon degree and direction of
slope, soil type and vegetation cover;
(10) That location factors are considered which address:
(a) Domestic uses shall be generally preferred;
(b) Uses not inherently source of pollution within an area shall be preferred over uses that are
ormay be a pollution source; and
(c) Use locations within an area tending to minimize the possibility of pollution shall be
preferred over use locations tending toincrease the possibility.
(11) That the conditional use shall, /n all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the
district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified by the
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Committee; and
(12) In the case of nonmetallic mining, the Conservation, Sanitation., & Zoning Committee shall also
consider any reclamation plan submitted for the property and the reclamation p|an's provisions for
maintaining lateral support and for depth of the quarry pursuant to the standards set forth in Wisconsin
Administration code Chapter NR 136.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE GRANT COUNTY
CONSERVATION, SANITATION & ZONING COMMITTEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Thursday, October 2, 2025
at 9:00 a.m. in Grant County Board Room #264 in the Administration Building, 111 S Jefferson
St., Lancaster, WI 53813 to consider the following items. If you are interested in reviewing the
detailed land descriptions, please contact the Grant County Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning
Dept. (608) 723-6080. If you would like to provide written comment for the committee
members, it must be submitted to our department five business days prior to the public
hearing.
If you would like to participate in the meeting but can't attend in person, please utilize the
following Zoom link or dial -in info:
https:Hus02web.zoom.us/j/84676276850?pwd=FMUVMtJXkWMbwgV1k01DHJZ2ywSPap 1
Dial In: 1 312 626 6799
Meeting ID: 846 7627 6850
Passcode: 610719
PETITION #CUP25-010: Conditional Use Permit Request for David Roh & Dale and Stacy
Hagenston, PIN:042-00460-0000, PIN:042-00480-0000, PIN:042-00478-0000, PIN:042-
00474-0000, & PIN:042-00643-0000, to allow for the continued use of Nonmetallic
Mining under Section 3.14(2)(a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
This is for ± 62.89 ac located in the NE % of the SE % and the SE % of the SE % of Section
11, and NE % of the NE % of Section 14, T8N, R1W, in Muscoda Township.
PETITION #CUP25-011: Conditional Use Permit Request for Mathews Island LLC,
PIN:060-00034-0000, PIN:060-00036-0000, PIN:060-00041-0000, to allow for an
accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal structure under Section
3.06 (2) (i) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. This is for ± 229.63 ac
located in the W % of the NE %, the NW % of the SE %, the SW %, the NW % of Section 2,
T8N, R2W, and the W % of the SE %, the NW % of the SE % of Section 3, T8N, R2W in
Watterstown Township.
PETITION #CUP25-012: Conditional Use Permit Request for Michaela L Beyer, PIN:014-
00378-0010, to allow for an accessory structure prior to the establishment of a principal
structure under section 3.07 (2) (a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance. This is for ± 6.59 ac located in the NE % of the SW % and the SE % of the SW
of Section 17, T4N, R2W in Ellenboro Township.
Lucas Finley, Zoning & Sanitation Technician
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Dept.
Published: 9/18/25 and 9/25/25
m
U
cM
Lo
O
N Lo
Lo
W N
E
� m
y
N0O
LL
U
o O
U �
c�
� O
rn
L U
i
O co
n
O
N
N
BEFORE GRANT COUNTY
CONSERVATION, SANITATION AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR K4|CHAELALBEYER
PIN# 014-00378-0010, ELLENBORO TOWNSHIP., GRANT COUNTY, WI
FINDINGS OF FACT
The agency finds that:
1. Michae/aBeyer owns property located within the NEY4ofthe SVVXandthe SENofthe SVVY4of
Section 17, Township 4 North, Range 2 West, Ellenboro Township, Grant County.,WiSuoh
property consists oftax parcel number P/N-014-0037O-OOlO
2. On July 29th 1 2025, the Conservation, Sanitation and Zoning Department (CSZD) discussed the
permitting required for an accessory structure built before a principal structure on PIN: 014-
00378-0010 which included obtaining a Conditional Use Permit since the current A2 zoning
allows for accessory structures to be built before a principal structure is established under
conditional use.
/
3. On August 6 th , 2025, the Ellenboro Township T 6*wn Board recommended approval for the CUP.3
were in favor, O opposed, and O abstained. No conditions were placed bythe Town Board on the
permit.
4. OnSeptember 11m ,2O25,the Conservation, Sanitation and Zoning Department (CSZO)received
a completed Conditional Use Permit application to allow for an accessory structure before a
principal structure under 3.07 (2) (a) of the Grant County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
5. On September 18 thand September 25 th,2024, apublic notice was published inthe County's
official newspaper for the CUP request.
6. OnOctober 2"d 2O25,the C3ZCreviewed the CUP request through apublic hearing and
determined the findings offact toapprove ordeny the CUP application.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSSION
1.The CSZC(hereinafter referred to as the agency) has the authority pursuant to the Grant
County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Ch. 315 Subsection 3.27 (5) to issue or deny
conditional use permits. Prior togranting ordenying aconditional use, the agency shall
make a findings of fact based on evidence presented, issue a determination whether the
standards of the ordinance are met, and require additional conditions, as needed. Based
upon the above findings and information provided at the public hearing, the CSZD finds that
the conditional use does ordoes not meet the fdUovvingcriteria:
2. The agency under Ch. 315 Subsection 3.27 (5) (c) shall consider the following criteria:
(1) That the establishment, maintenance,, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to
orendanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, orgeneral welfare;
(2) That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the
immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property
values within the neighborhood;
(3) That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;
(4) That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being
provided;
(5) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to
minimize traffic congestion /n the public streets;
(6) That adequate prevention and control ofwater pollution including sedimentation are being
provided;
(7) That adequate measures will be taken to sustain existing topographic and drainage features and
vegetation cover onthe site;
(8) That adequate location of the site with respect to flood plains and floodways of bodies of water;
(9) That adequate consideration of erosion potential of the site based upon degree and direction of
slope, soil type and vegetation cover;
(10) That location factors are considered which address:
(a) Domestic uses shall be generally preferred;
(b) Uses not inherently a source of pollution within an area shall be preferred over uses that are
or may be a pollution source; and
(c) Use locations within an area tending to minimize the possibility of pollution shall be
preferred over use |ocationstending to increase the possibility.
(11) That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the
district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified by the
Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Committee; and
(12) /n the case of nonmetallic mining, the Conservation, Sanitation, /& Zoning Committee shall also
consider any reclamation plan submitted for the property and the reclamation p|on's provisions for
maintaining lateral support and for depth of the quarry pursuant to the standards set forth in Wisconsin
Administration code Chapter NR 136.
Review of Standards for Rezoning Land out of Farmland Preservation
Date: Landowner:
I-ct
The Grant County Board may not rezone land out of a farmland preservation zoning district unless the Grant County
Zoning and Sanitation Committee finds all of the following in writing, after public hearing, as part of the official record of
the rezoning:
1. The rezoned land is better suited for a use not allowed in the farmland preservation zoning district.
Yes N
0 Q I
or o Explair -r
ty
(
(A A I*V
2. The rezoning is consistent with any comprehensive plan, adopted by the Grant County Board which is in
effect at the time of the rezoning.
esS) or No or N/A
Explain:`
P e 5 � �n�.
3. The rezoning is substantially consistent with the Grant County farmland preservation plan policy.
3.1: Non- farm development will be directed to non-agricultural soils or less productive agricultural
soils, consistent with the needs of the development. (Yes No
3.2 Non -farm development will be directed to areas where it will cause minimu +1sruption of
CU-CLL
established farm operations or damage to environmentally sensitive areas.es No
3.3 Non -farm development will be encouraged to locate so as to leave a maximum amount of
farmland in farmable size parcels. �s �e No
3.4 Non -farm residen ' I development will be directed to existing platted subdivisions and sanitary
districts. Yes No
3.5 Agriculturally -related development, while not discouraged in rural areas, will still comply with
other policies set forth in ' - section, consistent with being located where it will be a maximum
benefit to agriculture. Yes No
4 The rezoning will not substantially impair or limit current or future agricultural use of other protected farmland.
4.1 Located in a Farmland preservation zoning district
4.2 Covered by a Farmland Preservation Agreement
4.3 Covered by an agricultural conservation easement
4.4 Otherwise legally protected from nonagricultural development
Yes or No
Explain: iV) V�A�'5 rtUdNP qCt �ISVe,� a) ?Tt\CrV-\e
YCA
5 The CSZ <Te:comDmends�� does not recommend approval to the Grant County Board of Supervisors
(Circle one)
(7 a r a
:_3
Review of Standards for Rezoning Land out of Farmland Preservation
Date: 6-g/qS Landowner: A, G � L 0P16 r�, fl� k-,ir
The Grant County Board may not rezone land out of a farmland preservation zoning district unless the Grant County
Zoning and Sanitation Committee finds all of the following in writing, after public hearing, as part of the official record of
the rezoning:
1. The rezoned land is better suited for a use not allowed in the farmland preservation zoning district.
Yes )P(�r�+rN��V'�� es o r No Explain:
2. The rezoning is consistent with any comprehensive plan, adopted by the Grant County Board which is in
effect at the time of the rezoning.
,es or No or N/A
Explain:' 'j,
3. The rezoning is substantially consistent with the Grant County farmland preservation plan policy.
3.1: Non- farm development will be directed to non-agricultural soils or less productive agricultural
soils, consistent with the needs of the development. vo No
3.2 Non -farm development will be directed to areas where it will cause minimum disruption of
established farm operations or damage to environmentally sensitive areas.( 2 No
3.3 Non -farm development will be encouraged to locate so as to leave a maximum amount of
farmland in farmable size parcels. es No
3.4 Non -farm reside development will be directed to existing platted subdivisions and sanitary
e districts. a No
3.5 Agriculturally -related development, while not discouraged in rural areas, will still comply with
other policies set forth in section, consistent with being located where it will be a maximum
benefit to agriculture. `Yes No
4 The rezoning will not substantially impair or limit current or future agricultural use of other protected farmland.
4.1 Located in a Farmland preservation zoning district
4.2 Covered by a Farmland Preservation Agreement
4.3 Covered by an agricultural conservation easement
4.4 Otherwise legally protected from nonagricultural development
Yes or No
Explain:a Go "i
5 The CSZ=ecommenqds does not recommend approval to the Grant County Board of Supervisors
(Circle one)
.f . =r ^
1 1 - i "Y• .. .... ,t i ^. . , _..✓ r i .. ^. .. , .% .._ .. sr ,...t-7 � .n... ^... /.�. s. r. ._ ... s .. a .. -lam. 1 �.
. OT- z -
r A
.-...:. .>
><... ,... ..+.,.._.....,._.�. .,�...-. ...,.n^._,.y-^..,_ -r� f.:.:b-�h- �.• zn a.... r. .-t.�-: ;:s'�r: -r. s.- _e<..z�-3i--•--f:�:-:� �t.�. ,v,3 fit„ /o r.�:���,`r.
COUNTY COST SHARE PROGRAM
BEGINNING BALANCE:
$27,062.77
Priority
Tentative App
Final Request
EXTENSION REQUESTS:
CANCELLATIONS:
ACCOUNT BALANCE:
$27,062.77
FINAL APPROVAL REQUESTS:
Chad & Gail Winkers, Ellenboro twp. Well Decommissioning
$643.50
ACCOUNT BALANCE:
$26,41 9.27
TENTATIVE APPROVAL REQUESTS FOR C/S:
ENDING BALANCE
1%
2025 DATC P COST -SHARING
REQUESTS
BEGINNING BALANCE:
$38,281.56
PriorityTentative
App
Final Request
TENTATIVE APPROVAL:
Chrisitne Johnson, Liberty twp. Streambank Protection
$6,634.38
CANCELLATIONS:
ACCOUNT BALANCE:
$31,647.18
FINAL APPROVAL REQUESTS:
Louis & Ruth Vosberg, Hazel Green twp. Stream Crossing
$85874.85
Mark & Renee Vosberg, Hazel Green twp. Stream Crossing
$3,373.77
ENDING BALANCE
%�
Conservation:
1. Steve has completed 70 of the 100 spot checks so far this summer.
2. Reminder letters have been sent to get their NMPs in
3. We have had one non -point pollution complaint in Fennimore township. The landowner
has agreed not to stack at that location again.
4. Brady has completed GPS surveys of the existing conditions at the Grant County Farm.
5. Steve, Annette, and I volunteered at the Southwest WI Land Judging Contest held near
Burlington in Green County Sept 24th177 students from 19 schools participated.
Potosi, Fennimore took 1-2 with River Ridge placing 5th. Steve and I also volunteered at
the Sept loth Green County LWCD's annual land judging contest. I am looking to host
test pits for Grant County students for training purposes. Grant County will host the
event in 2027.
6. Tree and shrub species have been finalized for the 2026 Tree sale beginning this fall.
7. Brady has had three stream crossing projects completed. These included cricket frog
surveys completed internally.
8. Brady has had one culvert install including cricket frog surveys.
9. Brady is currently working on recently applied for stream crossing.
10. All 2025 SWRM funding has been allocated, and we are currently pulling from the 2026
projected funding.
Zoning:
1. Adam has conducted 22 pre -constructions and 2 post construction inspections on
2025 permits. He also completed 2 2024 post construction visits.
2. Four BOA decisions occurred on 9/25: Approved garage addition within 30 foot side
yard setback. Approved Shed construction within 50 foot township road setback
due to topography issues. Denied relief from the required 200' lot width road
frontage until current property litigation has been settled. Approved a fifth
residence on a private drive.
3. Request for a zoning review by Gay Brechler-Nagle for parcels 40-43-10 and 40-43.
Her petition is included in your packet.
Sanitation
1. 12 new permits were issued for a total of 93, 3 modifications, 1 revision, 2 reconnects, 1
transfer
2. 7 at grade review fees were processed
3. 1 called in complaint at Woodman for a landowner working on their own system. We
have not had time to check on this as of yet.
4. 1 sanitation complaint, DSPS has been onsite and has been requested to be onsite again
5. Drier weather has given installers good working conditions to get systems installed.
Gay S. Brechter-Nagle
5595 Green River Road
Fennimore, W1 53809
September 26th, 2.025
To:
Keith Lane, Zoning Administrator
Grant County Zoning Committee
Grant County Conservation,, Sanitation & Zoning Department
150 West ALona Lane., Suite #1
Lancaster, W1 53813
Re: Rezoning Petition and Clarification - Parcel Numbers 040-00043-0010 (A,-2) and
040-00043-0000 (FP)
Dear Mr. Lane and Members of the Zoning Committee,
Enclosed please find my Rezoning Petition and Request for Clarification concerning
adjoining parcels 040-00043-00 10 and 040-00043-0000.
Currently, Parcel 040-00043-0010 is zoned A-2 (Agriculture Transition), while Parcel 04010
00043-0000 is zoned FP (Farmland Preservation). Based on the history of road use, the
Abstract of Title easement, and the public responsibilities tied to the Township of Mt.
Ida town road and town road bridge,, I believe both parcels should carry A-2 zoning for
consistency a,nd public safety purposes,�
This discrepancy has caused confusion in determining jurisdictional responsibility for
maintenance, repair, and inspection of the Township of Mt. Ida town road and bridge,
which serve multiple properties and provide essential access. Aligning the zoning
classification will help clarify which governmental body (Township or County) is
responsible for maintaining and funding these obligations.
I respectfully request that this matter be placed on the agenda for review by the Grant
County Zoning Committee, and that a determination be made to correct this zoning
discrepancy.
Thank you for your attention and assistance. Please. confirm receipt of this petition and
advise when this matter will be scheduled for committee reviews
RespqctfulLy submitted,
Gay S. BrechLer-Nagle
RECEIVED SEP 2 6:?025'
,g.brechLer66@-gmaiL.com
Enclosure: Rezoning Petition and Request for Clarification — Exhibit AC
Rezoning Petition and Request for Clarification
Parcel Numbers: 040-00043-0010 (A-2) and 040-00043-0000 (FP)
To:
Grant County Conservation, Sanitation & Zoning Committee
Grant County Zoning Department
Keith Lane, Zoning Administrator
150 W. Alona Lane, Suite #1
Lancaster, W1 53813
From:
Gay S. Brechler-Nagle
5595 Green River Road
Fennimore, W1 53809
Date: September 26 th 22025
Subject: Request for Rezoning and Clarification of Zoning Designations
1, Gay S. Brechter-Nagle, respectfully submit this petition and request for clarification
regarding zoning inconsistencies affecting the following parcels: I
0 Parcel No. 040-00043-0010 - Currently zoned A-2 (Agricultural Transition District)
Parcel No, 040-00043-0000 -Currently zoned FP (Farmland Preservation District)
Background
1. On September 15, 2025, 1 received a zoning map and documents from Zoning
Administrator I(eith Lane showing that parcel 040-00043-0010 is zoned A-2 while
parcel 040-00043-0000 is zoned FP.
2. 1 believe that parcel 040-00043-0000 should also be zoned A-2, in order to remain
consistent with its actual use, adjacency to parcel 040-00043-0010, and historical
treatment under township road access.
3. This discrepancy highlights the public nature and jurisdictional, responsibilities of
the Township of Mt. Ida and the County of Grant regarding the Township of Mt. Ida
town road and town road bridge located within these parcels,
Request
I request that the Grant County Zoning Committee and Zoning Department:
1. Clarify the current zoning classification of both parcels and provide written
explanation of the reasoning for the difference in zoning.
2. Confirm whether rezoning of parcel 040-00043-0000 from FP to A-2 is
appropriate, given its use and connection to parcel 040-00043-0010.
3. Survey and confirm jurisdiction over the Township of Mt. Ida town road and
bridge, including the property lines of parcels 040-00043-0010 and 040-00043-
0000, to ensure proper public oversight and compliance with statutory duties.
Legal and Practical Considerations
• Section 3.07 AGRICULTURE A-'2 DISTRICT is intended to serve as a transition zone
from urban to rural lands, accommodating agricultural use and road access.
The current split zoning classification may impair public safety, road maintenance
obligations, and equitable treatment of adjoining parcels.
• Proper zoning clarification is necessary to ensure that the Township of Mt. Ida and
the County of Grant fulfill -their statutory responsibilities for the roadbed, bridge,
drainage, and farm access affecting both Plaintiffs" and Defendant's Lands in Case
No. 2023CV0001 64.
Relief Requested
I respectfully request that the Grant County Zoning Committee:
1. Issue a format determination on the proper zoning classification of both parcels.
I
2. If necessary., initiate a rezoning action to make parcel 040-00043-0000 consistent
with parcel 040-00043-0010 (A-2).
3. Provide this determination in writing for inclusion into my ongoing legal proceedings
as Exhibit AC,
Respectfully Submitted,
Gay S. BrechLer-Nagle
5595 Green River Road
Fennimore, WI 53809
gbrechLer66,@gmait.com,
(608)485-2066
GreenUountv
(6) L
TM
wc-
Wp1Ep CONSERVATION DEPARTI LENT
GREEN COUNTY LANO AND
1627 4ch Ave West
Monroe, WI 53566
608-325-4195
SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN LAND JUDGING CONTEST HELD
Monroe, Wi — The Southwest Wisconsin land judging contest was held on September 24. This contest is
hosted by the Grant, Lafayette, and Green County Land and Water Conservation Departments. Schools
participating were Argyle, Black Hawk, Cassville, Cuba City, Dodgeville, Fennimore, Juda, Lancaster,
Milton, Monroe, Monticello, Mt. Horeb, Pecatonica, Platteville, Potosi, Prairie du Chien, River Ridge,
Seneca, and Shullsburg. There were a total of 170 students from 19 schools.
The students traveled to the John Abey farm in Brooklyn Township. Students reviewed four soil pits and
determined the position in landscape, slope of the field, type and degree of erosion or if there was
deposition, evaluated soil properties, such as texture, structure, and drainage, estimated slope, ranked
land classes, observed soil limitations, checked for invasive species, and recommended conservation
practices.
The top ten individuals were as follows: (score is out of a possible 400)
1.
River Sahr
Potosi
301
2.
Manhattyn Udelhofen
Potosi
294
3.
Aaron Edger
Potosi
293
4.
Harmony Reynolds
Potosi
291
5.
Abilene Bartz
Dodgeville
291
6.
Teegan Griswold
Fennimore
284
7.
Tim Brunner
Fennimore
282
8.
Otto Kasper -Theisen
Cassville
279
9.
Alan Stepflug
Fennimore
279
10.
Brad Retallick
Potosi
277
The top five teams were as follows: (score is out of a possible 1200)
1. Potosi
866
2. Fennimore
842
3. Dodgeville
818
4. Monroe
791
5. River Ridge
781
Thank yous go to Brent Wollin for digging the pits for the contest. Jeremy Ziegler and Natalie Irizarry of
the Natural Resources Conservation Service were the official judges of the contest. Tonya Gratz, Mason
Jarosinski, and Todd Jenson of the Green County Land and Water Conservation Department, Chelsea
Starr, of the Green County Natural Resources Conservation Service, Keith Lane, Steve Smith, and
Annette Lolwing of the Grant County Land Conservation Department, and Max Blackbourn of the
Lafayette County Land Conservation ran the contest. And of course to John Abey for hosting the contest.